Friday, March 12, 2004

Can You Help Save This Marriage?

Please help me settle a marital dispute, one in which I am clearly in the right. I work VERY HARD at my job, and on Mondays, I take both my lunch and dinner to work b/c I have a night class. I left my tupperware in my office for two days, and brought it home Wednesday. This morning, Friday, there are still five containers with rotting remains: curried beef, yogurt, pineapple, vegetables, and lentil soup. James has cleaned the entire kitchen twice, but the containers are still sitting on the counter.

He says, "You can't just pass off your rotting food on me."

I said, "If you really loved me, you'd clean my rotting food."

He said, "Get over yourself."

I said, "That doesn't feel like love."

Who is right? Should I clean my own tupperware, or leave it sitting out as a test of his love for me? I'm prepared to wait it out.


College Students Say the Darndest Things
Three women students are sitting in a student lounge. I, too, am sitting in the lounge reading...er... eavesdropping.
Woman 1: I think Christians are better looking than other people.
Woman 2: What?!
Woman 1 (waving arms): Just look around! These people are very attractive!
Woman 3: Well, at least they're clean-cut.
Woman 2: Yea, for sure.

My Day Begins
Strengthened by your encouragements, I'm going to write now. Right now. Here I go. Don't try to stop me.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 11, 2004

A Below-Average Blog

Dayton's -- I mean Marshall Field's -- is up for sale. Somehow Marshall Field's is a point of stability in my childhood memory, even though it is just a store and we rarely shopped there. It's disturbing that its name changed, and now that it's being sold.

I'm blogging late today because I taught an extra night class last night for a colleague who is out of town. I tried to sleep in, but still I'm really tired. It's so much easier to come in as a guest speaker than to have the class for the whole semester. I teach better as a guest - I think I give it all my energy, rather than thinking about what needs to happen in the next class sessions. Our topic was homosexuality. I let them make collages, which always seems to be a hit.

I didn't write last Friday, which is my Lenten practice. I'm afraid to write badly on the topic of suffering, so I just want to keep the thought in my head where they look so good. My writing is all about Romans 5, the text for the sermon most of you heard a few weeks ago. I plan to stay home tomorrow and write, no matter what.

If you'd like to comment today, here's two ideas-
1. Offer me some encouragement for writing tomorrow.
2. Tell me something you're looking forward to in the next 24 hours.

I'm looking forward to not going in to the office tomorrow.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, March 10, 2004

If you had to choose...

If you had to choose between being a hot athlete or having a normal name, which would you pick? Laugh no more at Gary Heffelfinger - he's an award-winning skater!

My dh ("dear husband" abbreviation on fertility-related discussion boards) works at the Mall of America. We were talking about why people shop so frequently. If it really made them happy, then wouldn't it be satisfying for awhile? Instead, it seems that people pursue happiness, but then have to do it over and over and over - maybe shopping doesn't deliver all that it promises. Of course, the same process happens for sex, but this is as it should be.

When does shopping make you happy? I rarely shop impulsively, but last week I had a hard day and decided to leave work early and shop for a wedding present (shopping for someone else softens the moral finger-pointing in my head). I bought a pig-shaped salsa bowl hand-made in Chili at a just-trade Mennonite store. Then I bought myself some tulips because I liked their shade of pink. Both of these things did, in fact, make me happy, or at least pleased. And now, five days later, when I look at them, they still make me happy.

For you, when has shopping failed to deliver promised happiness, and when has it actually paid off?

And last, a P.S., a posting on March 8 from Christy that was encouraging to me, and maybe to others at the Porch.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, March 09, 2004

The cake was eaten with Colleen, KP and Anna, and they ate most of it before I even got there.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

I ate a lot of chocolate cake last night

Sugar is a powerful healing force in the universe, and I'm grateful for it. I have too much going on, both in the material world and in my mind, to blog today. Somehow I feel obligated to say that, rather than just leave the blog blank.

A few miscellaneous notes about my day, just so you can know what I'm up to:
- I'm going to the Good Earth for lunch.
- James took out the recycling this morning.
- I came up with a brilliant phrase on the spot for Ruby. "What do you want? You can have whatever you want. I love you, and love means giving people whatever they want."
- My skin looks bad today (because I stayed up too late eating chocolate cake).
- The Thomas Kincake puzzle is now sold (ebay), and you all missed out.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, March 08, 2004

Oatmeal cookies and global conspiracies

A bit on fundamentalism, but first, two happenings from the weekend.
1. As an act of mourning, I made Martha Stewart’s perfect oatmeal cookies, and added chocolate chips, pecans, and dried cherries (from Carla’s Bon Appetit). The recipe called for too much butter, and now they are totally flat and crispy. Not inedible (I’m eating one right now), but not perfect. Then I made the oatmeal-raisin cookies off the oatmeal container, and they were much better. Sorry, Martha.

2. Psychological triumph: I set a boundary with someone in my life who doesn’t know boundaries. I cried and threw a tantrum beforehand because I was afraid of people being mad at me, but then moved on. Well, actually James set the boundary by making the difficult phonecall, but I let him do it – so I should get some credit!

Against peoples’ advice to listen to a better radio station (NPR is just so…straightforward and based in reality!), I didn’t listen to the radio and instead read the magazine Prophecy in the News. When I was 16, I read “88 Reasons Why the Rapture will Happen in 1988” and was afraid for that entire year. Now they’re writing prophecy each year based on the psalms – Psalm 104 predicts 2004, for example. I’m not falling for it this year. I did, however, find some beliefs in the magazine, and found a few in my head, to add to the list.

1. Numerology helps us understand the Bible. God has buried mysteries in there that come clear with use of numerology.
2. Haitians can’t be helped because one day, long ago, all the Haitians came together and dedicated their island to Satan.
3. Rock music is based on syncopation from Africa, which is why rock music lets Satan into your soul (Africans obviously being controlled by Satan).
4. African-Americans are cursed because of what Ham did to Noah – no point in trying to help them.
5. The Bible lends itself to chronological charting of the future.
6. God loves you, but he gets mad really easily (look what he did to his son).
7. Bill Clinton is an antichrist figure that parallels Nero.

I don’t want to simply collect an exhaustive list of these beliefs. I’m trying to place the beliefs sociologically, and articulate the worldview that lies behind them. I think the conspiratorial, supernatural, demonic beliefs are held by a subset of fundamentalists and evangelicals, and by a greater percentage of charismatics – is this right, or is my perception as bigoted as number 2,3,4 above? The beliefs about God and the Bible are more mainstream fundamentalism, and they ring in the subconsciousness of many evangelicals.

The worldview behind fundamentalism? The ideology seems to be supported by a number of basic beliefs, some of which are quite contradictory.
1. Nature of God: God loves you and wants to save you, but he also hates you and takes pleasure in doing justice which may involve damning you forever.
2. Nature of God: God is all-powerful, but can’t protect even his own children from Satan.
3. Nature of humans: Humans are weak and totally sinful, but still can be held accountable for making the free and good choice to choose Christ.
4. Nature of the world: Greek dualism – the body is bad and the spirit is good.
5. Nature of humans: God made all humans in his image, but some are so sinful they cannot be redeemed (Haitians, Africans, all Blacks). Just religious legitimation for racism, which is neither original nor difficult to perceive.
6. Bible: Bible is all true and speaks plain meaning in literal terms. Yet we also need numerology, codes, and derivative charts to understand it.
7. Conspiracy: Maybe this comes from late 19th c. liberalism – the sense that people are after us trying to destroy our movement. Conspiracies abound – weather control, gov’t, end times, Bill Clinton… They’re mostly on talk radio in the middle of the night, when people can’t think critically anyway.

Do you have more to add (or do you have a perfect oatmeal cookie recipe to share with me)? That’s enough for me today. I’m really thinking of buying Tim LaHaye’s book of end times charts. In the Thief in the Night films, a man put up the charts in his basement and brought in his neighbors to teach them the truth. I’d like to analyze the charts. But do I want to spend $20 on Tim LaHaye stuff? Maybe not - there's plenty free on-line. Here's a fairly good chart, but it doesn't have any drawings of beasts, the lake of sulphur, or the horsemen of the Apocalypse. Oh well - you have to pay for illustration.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, March 05, 2004

Long Blog, But Special

Today I would like to share a draft of an article I'm writing about linguistics. It's longer than my blog entries, and I won't feel bad if you don't have the time to read it. A number of you offered interesting ideas on fundamentalism that I want to think about over the weekend, and post about again next week. Peace to all today!

Fifty Ways to Lose Your Lunch

Language reveals a lot about a culture. The Greeks, for example, had four words for love, distinguishing between erotic love (eros), family love (storge), friendship (philia), and unselfish love (agape). American English uses just one word sloppily for all these different emotions. Spanish speakers distinguish between conocer and saber, two ways to know. Again, English has just one word. When I searched briefly for English words for penis, however, I found thirty two. Thirty nine for sexual intercourse. Four hundred and ninety four for marijuana.

Overlooking my native tongue’s obvious lack of class, I offer this proposal to improve the English language. During five early months of a recent pregnancy, I vomited at least 400 times. I was unable to communicate the meaning of this experience to others because of the linguistic limitations of English. American English offers its users many words for vomit. We commonly use puke, hurl, retch, spew, ralph, hurl, upchuck, and the clinical regurgitate, emesis, or to be sick. Some, especially those who drink too much, have made an art of vomit language: driving the porcelain bus, blowing chunks, tossing your cookies, losing your lunch, talking to ralph on the big white phone, and, new to me, singing psychedelic praises to the depths of the china bowl.

Complexity in vomit vocabulary displays the intelligence and spirit of the American people, but one area has been left entirely unexplored: the nature of vomit itself. Similar to using just one word for the many types of love, it is sadly inadequate to use just one word for the varieties of vomit. Pregnant women and other frequent hurlers could, perhaps, elicit more sympathy and care if they could more clearly explain precisely what they are vomiting. On the international scene, Americans would also appear to be a more intelligent people if we could demonstrate superior linguistic innovation. We’re falling behind in science and math, but I think crass linguistics could be our niche.

What follows is the beginning of a dictionary of vomit. It is based largely on my experience, and I acknowledge it as just a small step forward. Notably absent are entries about drunken vomit, and vomit related to various diseases. These areas should be explored by experts, which I am not. I’ll just offer what I know: pregnancy vomits and mild food poisoning vomit. I sincerely hope other writers and expert retchers will use this vocabulary, develop and extend it, and so contribute to our culture.

Bile hurl. Bile hurl contains nothing but bile, the slippery and bright yellow acid in the stomach. It is a relatively weak vomit, but usually comes at the end of a series of more aggressive pukes. It looks fairly innocent, but bile hurl has a powerful taste because the taste buds for bitter flavors are on the back of the tongue, the vomit superhighway. Bile hurl also eats away at the throat, making the voice scratchy or absent altogether. Bile hurl is sometimes accompanied by a weak voice whispering, “I’m so sick.”

Food-refusal vomit. When the body refuses food immediately, puke consists of the food in its original form, moistened. It’s hardly disturbed, and could be eaten again later in a pinch. Food-refusal vomit may be produced up to 90 minutes after ingestion, in my experience, and perhaps even later for others. The corner of a saltine eaten while horizontal, for example, may emerge whole and unscathed after an hour and a half of rest. When experiencing food-refusal vomiting, it is wise to choose foods based on the ease of vomiting them later. Granola, for example, is too dry and sharp, but cheerios are mild and smooth. Tomato-based soups produce burning hot acid, but clear soups swim upstream like salmon. Coffee produces the same sour result as tomato soup, but black tea and green tea bring only a not entirely unpleasant warmth that rises quickly from belly to mouth. Meat is heavy, requiring strong muscle contractions to work against gravity, but vegetables are slippery and light. Despite what I once suspected, eating sweets does not make food-refusal vomit taste better, not even if the sweets are Ding Dongs or gas station chocolate donettes. The taste buds for sweet flavors are on the tip of the tongue, so sweetness cannot be tasted when food enters the mouth from the back.

False emesis (commonly known as dry heaves). When the body is too weak to really puke, it retches to no effect. Totally dry, not even water or bile. False emesis can be identified early by the quality of muscle contractions, and if correctly diagnosed, you can just stay in bed or watching TV while retching. If wrongly diagnosed, of course, you’ll be sorry. Even if you look yourself straight in the eyes in the mirror and sternly say “Stop playing!”, you cannot stop false emesis. You just have to ride it out.

Orally contained vomit. The frequency of orally contained vomit is determined by the modesty of the puker. When my friend Julie went to work, for example, she was separated from the bathroom by a long hallway. She puked in her mouth and calmly walked to the bathroom, without revealing it to her co-workers. I, on the other hand, would rather puke in my hands and carry it to the bathroom in front of everyone. Fortunately, I work at a school and was pregnant during the summer, so I didn’t face this challenge.

Rotten ralph. Rotten ralph is a non-pregnancy vomit, produced by mild food poisoning. A special form, in my experience, is meat cooked with tomato-based sauce. The throat and back of the tongue are sensitive to the unique taste of rotten, partially digested meat, and acidic sauce adds an unmistakable throat burn. Ground beef enchiladas and picnic chicken marinated in tomato sauce provided me with two outstanding examples. Frequently originating at picnics and potlucks, rotten ralph is rarely found alone. Usually it is part of a double orifice elimination.

Sleep spew. Recording this form of vomit is extremely important because it is rare. I sometimes woke up out of a dead sleep, fully convulsing. This type of vomit was handy for the pregnancy itself, which seemed to want to torture me 24 hours a day. When I woke up retching, I said in my mind, “You don’t have to throw up. You’re just walking to the bathroom. Just walking. It’s OK.” Mind control works for about 15-20 seconds, just enough time to get to the sink.

Surprise spew. Sometimes it seems that, despite weeks of daily vomiting, this day will be the day it ends. You eat something, it stays down for 15 minutes, and you’re so pleased that you keep eating. You eat numerous foods, say Doritos, a Ding Dong, milk, and a peach. Then the body sabotages the mind with a surprise spew, something you never saw coming. It’s frequently embarrassing, like the time I spewed a half-digested apple onto a wall in my doctor’s office. Another time I ate a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and Coke, and surprise spewed. I threw up the sandwich, the color from the Coke (somehow it separates from the liquid), and something lime green that I never identified. This is the only pregnancy puke that I think about months later, wondering about those green bits.

Waterretch. Water is a vomit trigger for many pregnant women. This is a simple vomit, though the first few times will be mixed with the bitter taste of bile. If you’re the kind of fool I was, you will continue sipping water, thinking that your body will prefer the third or fourth swallow. The third and fourth vomit will not contain any bile. This is the only vomit that tastes precisely the same in both directions. Though it seems easy and trouble-tree, waterretch is not to be trifled with. Dehydration sets in quickly and will land you in the hospital.

These are only eight words for the nature of vomit, based on an informal investigation with a sample size of one. May it be the beginning of a vocabulary bonanza. There are about a quarter million distinct words in the English language. Let’s make it 250,008 and counting.



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 04, 2004

Strange Things I Used To Believe

I visited with a certain family member from my maternal side last night. Let me be discrete – my family knows little about the Internet, and nothing about my blog, but one of them could discover google anyday. I heard several familiar beliefs from this family member, which started me brainstorming about others. Can you add to the list?

This is what I heard last night:
1. On evangelism: God is knocking at your door, saying, “Are you gonna believe in me before the axe falls?”
2. The end times: The superhighway running from China to Russia has recently been completed. China and Russia are conspiring to attack Israel. God will protect Israel and smite the Russians and Chinese.
3. Election: God isn’t trying to save the Jews anymore. They are just part of his plan to save us.
4. The government: It’s sad that Bush can’t be the great leader he could be. He’s forced to do what they say. “Who are they?”, I asked. “The Rockefellers.”
5. The weather: The government controls the weather with magnets on the poles of the earth.
6. Airplanes. The government drops chemicals on us with small planes. (I get occasional phonecalls during the summer urging me to get inside NOW!)
7. Calvinism: "God is in control, even when bad things happen. He loves you, but he is just and punishes sin. I have found that after he knocks you down, he comes back to kick you in the head." (This was wasn't from last night, but it runs through my head frequently).

It was hard to fall asleep last night after all of that! I thought mostly about demons, however. The fundamentalist radio host who I can’t stand (Todd Friel) talks about contemplative prayer and demons. The idea, also from my family, is that demons are prowling around (like a lion, seeking whom they may destroy) trying to get into your life. If you meditate or open your mind to insights from other religions, then demons will swarm in and ye shall be like the man who was tormented by seven demons. The radio fundies today are warning against Richard Foster's writings on devotional practices. They say that the Bible says to pray with words, and to pray with total consciousness. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that you should be quiet, or open, or meditating, during prayer. This allows the demons of Zen and the Eastern Religions to come into you.

One problem is that this is biblidolatry – the Bible will give you all truth, and there’s no need to listen to the Spirit or to God directly. Reading is the primary spiritual discipline (and where is that in Scripture?). The biggest problem for me is that I grew up with a fear that I would be demon-possessed if I prayed wrong, or if I thought too openly. I have been told to my face that I’m demon-possessed by some of these people (A fellow factory worker who folded Christian calendars with me tried to exorcise the demon of parental disobedience from me). Why would Jesus allow demons to come into my mind? I think of the Celtic prayer – Christ before me, behind me, under me, over me, within me… When my mind is totally open in meditation, it is Jesus who lives in my consciousness, Jesus in my mind. I don’t have to close my mind to trap him in there. I believe in demon possession, and I think I’ve seen it twice and it was terrifying, but I don’t think it is due to contemplative prayer.

I talked with some fellow professors about this, and one said, “Maybe the problem is you, Jenell. Don’t you have other stations on your radio?” Someone else said, “Don’t blog about this issue. It doesn’t expose the fundamentalists – it exposes you for being a fool to engage such a silly argument.” This is a good point.

I am working on my worldview, at the age of 31, more intensively than I have since my early 20s. I tell my students this, too, when we discuss questions of faith in class – who is God, how does he work in the world, what are the spiritual presuppositions behind the theories of racial justice we’re studying… I say, “I really am not sure myself, and I’m as interested in exploring the questions as you are. Well, except for those of you who are sleeping – I guess you’re not interested at all.” Why do we say that worldview formation is especially important for young adults? It's important for kids, even if they can't articulate the ideas with words. It's important to begin the articulation and intellectualizing as young adults - I teach them to start taking up the questions and living with them, and settling on answers and directions that will shape their lives. I don’t teach them to open their minds for four years and then clamp them shut. These basic questions are always there, and resurface for inspection and transformation from time to time.

I truly wish I could be fundamentalist. The Fundamentals, the tracts published by the first fundies 100 years ago, emphasize the truth of Scripture, the centrality of Jesus, the Trinity, the Virgin birth…all good stuff and solid. This is my heritage – fundamentalists are, in many ways, my people. They are just so terribly judging and separatist, and my life choices make me a poor fit. My grandpa was a fundamentalist pastor, and it makes me sad that he couldn’t be proud of me (female professor who has authority over male students, living in an egalitarian marriage).

Peace and love to you all today. Please find something more useful to do in the world today than attacking our brother Richard Foster!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, March 03, 2004

PLARIMS (Peace Like a River in My Soul)

I don’t want to spoil the book for Shelley or Marlene, so I won’t discuss plot too much, rather, just write about what the book meant to me. My writing will be inadequate, because the beauty of it all is the narrative, and I’m just abstracting some thoughts from it.

Enger’s vision reminds me of some of the comments people wrote on Ash Wednesday and earlier. We just don’t have access to sure information about death, heaven, or hell, yet we long to know. Enger imagines these things, just like KP imagines iced tea in heaven. I think of these as “comfort beliefs.” We believe some things about our loved ones and about God because the beliefs are a comfort to us. They are about unknowable, undebatable things, and as long as we hold them lightly and without dogmatism, I think they’re fine.

Miracles.
One man in the book is gifted to perform miracles. He performs them occasionally, and cannot produce them on demand. Bad people are healed, while good people are not. Smaller things are repaired, while larger wounds remain open. Some characters in the book are untouched by desperately needed miracles, though they live in close proximity to the man. They both long for healing, and accept other peoples’ miracles as a sign of God’s presence and love. I am comforted by the presence of a loving God in the book, and in my world. There’s just no explaining why things happen as they do, for good and for bad, for various people. Things happen as they happen, and perhaps it really is God’s love behind it all in some ultimate way. You can’t force his hand or demand what you want, but you can be attentive and eager, trusting that you’ll see love happen somewhere in the universe.

Death.
One person in the book was allowed to die for a loved one, exchanging places. As with the miracles, numerous other people in the story died without resurrection, some without dignity or comfort at the last. For unexplainable reasons, one person was resurrected, at the expense of another. I have wished for this scenario myself, but it was not a gift given to me. It was cathartic, and a blessing, to watch it happen for someone else.

Both Shelley and Marlene want to read it - does anyone have a spare copy? I'll bring mine on Sunday for one of you. By the way, Frank McCourt wrote a review that said, PLAR has "passages so wondrous and wise you'll want to claw yourself with pleasure." Do you claw yourself when reading good books? I hadn't yet considered it.

Assorted things I’ve purchased this week.
1. Canned pumpkin for the cats. I said to them, “Rachel says you’ll like it!”, but they won’t eat it.
2. James’ workplace gave him a $25 gift certificate to Cub, so I put it toward groceries and splurged on a pineapple.
3. A reading lamp for my bedroom. I got one for our wedding, but the cats knock it over during the night. Rather than attempt to train them, stifling their natural freedom, I just bought a heavier lamp.
4. Two Bethel sweatshirts. Two related wardrobe principles: a) It’s not OK to wear sweats to work. B) It is OK to wear sweats to work if they are imprinted with the name of your workplace. One says, “Bethel Dad”, but you can’t be too picky when rifling through the 75% off rack.

College Students Say the Darndest Things!
”I’m afraid that if I do badly on the paper, you won’t like me anymore.”

P.S.
I don't love Scarlett Johannsen or Charlize Theron. Sorry. I truly love Robert Duvall, because from behind, when he's walking, he looks like my dad.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, March 02, 2004

Lenten Challenges

First off, I apologize for not devoting more attention to Charlize Theron, and for not knowing Scarlett Johannsen's name (nor how to spell it). I don't stay up past 10 very often, so I missed the final awards, and missed seeing Charlize's dress and, apparently more importantly, her boyfriend.

Dammit! I am sitting here at work and smell a faint odor of urine. One of the cats pissed on the sweater I'm wearing. I might just wear it anyway, or else I'll have to wear my jacket instead of a sweater. I'm not mad, tho. I'm sure she just had to go really bad, and really, it's my fault for even owning the sweater.

The real topic of the day is Lenten Challenges. I know we are called to be Christ to each other, but in the spirit of holistic faith, maybe we should also be Satan to each other. My vision is that we offer temptations and obstacles to observing our Lenten practices. The first challenge I want to offer is to Javier. I challenge Javier to write a good-hearted reflection on Thomas Kinkade's art. Remember, Javier gave up cynicism for Lent. And, by the way, I'm selling a Kinkade puzzle on ebay this week. Don't even ask how I wind up with this stuff. I don't think anyone should challenge MarMar, however. There's no joy in kicking a person when she's already down. Only praise and encouragement for her journey.

I'm either going to wear my spare cardigan or my coat to class. I really can't wear this sweater.

I want to tell you about what I learned from Peace Like a River...tomorrow. Peace and love to all today.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, March 01, 2004

Don't Be A Freak!

In the style of Luke, I'll offer some transparency about my life. I got up this morning and the first words I shouted were, "Shut the &*%$ up, Opal! Don't be a freak!" Then I gave Ruby some milk (she gets milk every morning because she misses her mother), and Opal sniffed Ruby's butt while she drank her milk. Sad to say, that's not the freaky behavior. Wearing the same sweats I wore to church last night (they serve as both pajamas and church clothes), I made some wonderful coffee. James brought me Seattle's Best coffee from Seattle, a new mug, and chocolate covered graham crackers. I asked him for a present, and I know he got them at the airport on the way home, but I'm easy (as I inappropriately mentioned in an e-mail to Carla).

And now I sit down to blog. Blogging is shallow this morning because I'm eager to spend my morning minutes reading Peace Like a River, The Best Book in the World. Rachel recommended it - it's a novel about a family growing up in 1960s rural Minnesota. It's about miracles and faith and loyalty. I was reading about them driivng in an unheated car west through NoDak in the winter, and I got so cold I had to go back to my flannel-clad bed to read!

Subject of the day: Petty Commentary on the Academy Awards
Overall comments. Too much white, not enough color. It makes Jesus sad when non-virgins wear white formal dresses. Jesus doesn't like big bows on the butt, either. Oh, sorry, that's just my opinion.
Julia Roberts. Great dress, average color. Some sort of breast alteration, cuz they looked big.
Liv Tyler. Beautiful face, great glasses. Strange 1982 hair.
Nicholas Cage. Tie and collar too wide.
Catherine Zeta-Jones. Perfection. Beautiful color, tank-style neckline, hair, face, all perfect.
Diane Keaton. She needs an intervention. She keeps dressing like that, and no one seems to help her.
Woman from the Pearl Earring Movie. I loved her teal dress. Lipstick too dark.
Peter Jackson. See Diane Keaton comments.
James and Jenell. Wearing pajamas (also known as "church clothes"), holding hands, drinking tea, cats on laps. Perfection!


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, February 28, 2004

Happy now with color?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, February 27, 2004

Avert your gaze!

My sincere apologies to all who were pained by having to look at my grotesque blog. I had hoped it was the color of rot, but as Carla pointed out, it is more like puke. Pink it shall be, whenever I have an hour to change it. Give me contrast ideas – I tried purple and green, and didn’t like either. Orange? Blue? And what’s up with that Hugo guy who wrote in and didn’t even comment on color? Focus, Hugo, focus!

My question today is about the First Commandment. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. If this was really about polytheism, it would say “Thou shalt have no gods other than me.” Can I have a god who is after Jehovah? I’m considering Oprah. I know gratitude is mentioned in Scripture, but Jesus never mentioned gratitude journals. If I can’t have her as a god, I’ll settle for veneration.

Last September, one person said to me, “Well, there’s nothing I can say to bring your babies back, so there’s really nothing to say. Time will heal it.” And she’s hardly spoken to me since! I don’t think time is much of a healer. As time passes, depression deepens, secrets intensify, inner voices get louder, and memories hound. For me, three things have been healing: receiving love, giving love, and gratitude. Part of the reason I share my feelings and my journey is because I want to get some love, which is always an occasion to share some back, and then I want to look back at the love fest with gratitude. Articulating bad feelings dissipates them, but speaking gratitude makes gratitude blossom. The love I receive is solidarity, friendship, food, touch, prayer, attention, words, and the like. I intend to give the same, and I hope I sometimes do. If anyone has the gift of resurrecting the dead, please e-mail me at jparis@bethel.edu. In the absence of resurrection, though, love is no door prize. It is everything, and may we all have lots of it today.

…..

I feel like I’ve written enough for one blog, and I’m changing tone quickly, but I want to share some feedback on Reimagining Spiritual Formation. It is from a classic voice of modernity, my mom.
·Why would I want to read about these peoples’ lives? I hope they used pseudonyms, because this is way too personal for a book.
·The book sounds like Doug speaks – all that “rhythm” and “ways” and “life”
·Who has authority? Who tells people what is right to think? That’s the thing that really seems missing from your church.
·I stopped reading the journals, because I don’t want to read other peoples’ journals.
·Is the Carla in the book the woman with the thin, serious pastor for a husband? He sure likes that prayer book he carries around.
·I guess it’s a good place for the artsy, creative people who need to do things differently than everyone else.
·I’ve never seen people at a church love each other they way they love you and James. You’re blessed to be there.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, February 26, 2004

What the Day After Ash Wednesday Means To Me, 2004

I thought Jesus suffered so I'd never have to, and Christians would be a light to the heathen by their cheerfulness and simple happiness. Then why were we all so crazy sad yesterday? I only meant to sign up for the happy parts of Christianity - I'm going to go check the contract.

James is coming home tomorrow, which is very good for me. He's been rehabbing a house in Seattle. For a few days, I enjoyed having no one disturb the areas of the house I had cleaned. Then I just started missing him. I didn't mention it earlier in case any of my readers are stalkers. If you are, then ready, set, go! You have 30 hours to find me.

I know I wrote a sad blog yesterday, but still, why didn't anyone comment on my new color scheme? You could have said, "Hey, I know it's sad that so much death has come to you, but look on the bright side - you have nice colors on your blog!" Or you could have said, "Jesus doesn't want you to be sad. Stop it. Keep distracting yourself with cyber-decorating." These Christian encouragements could have eased my burden, but no one offered them.

A blessed Lent to everyone. The resurrection has begun in each of us as we live in new ways - less food, different food, less TV, more prayer, more writing, quieter inner damning voices... May Easter come soon. (And may it be on a warm, non-raining morning, seeing as my church in one of the coldest states likes to stand outside on Easter morning).

Oh, for cute!
I couldn't get Ruby to come in yesterday, so I left a dish of food out for her so she wouldn't feel abandoned. Then she did come in, but I left the food out anyway. Someone came and ate it during the day. I am considering leaving more food out today so the new cat won't feel abandoned.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, February 25, 2004

What Ash Wednesday Means To Me, 2004

My boys’ bodies were reduced to ashes, and their urns rest on a shelf in my house. Their death, my trauma, and our loss are set before my eyes each day. Today I receive the mark of ashes. When I receive it – the remnants of palm leaves burned and destroyed - I will remember that our world is unspeakably broken.

Some people live for many hours, while others, like my babies, live only for an hour or two. From ashes we came, and to ashes we return. Today I receive the mark of ashes. Today I am alive, and I hope to live well. Someday I will die, and I hope to die well.

Our Lord Jesus lived a brief life of love. People didn’t receive his love, and so had no love to give, and then unspeakable harm occurred. Today I receive the mark of ashes. During Lent, may my life be emptied of sin and filled with love.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, February 24, 2004

Nellie, Nellie, the big fat Jellie

Happy Fat Tuesday!

I cooked myself some bacon this morning, looked at the fat at the end of one piece, and contemplated this question: What's good about fat?

1. Sometimes it tastes like bacon.
2. Sometimes it tastes like chocolate.
3. It's good for your brain.
4. It attracts men, in most cultures throughout human history (those unaffected by the West).
5. It's more comfortable to sit on than bones.
6. It's soft, and soft is nice.
7. It gives your man a little something to hang on to.
8. ...see comments section for more...

Feast today, for tomorrow we fast!



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, February 23, 2004

I am not obligated to give you sex

Someone said they expected to read more about sex on my blog. Sorry, but I have a headache, and I'm just not in the mood.

Someone else said they found my cat stories to be less than fascinating. That someone was my pastor, who I would expect to be always affirming and encouraging of my gifts. In addition to perceiving other peoples' sins, I also have the gift of writing about animals in a "Today's Christian Reader" style. In addition to Doug, Marlene also seemed not very impressed with my pets, and my own husband said he is embarrassed for me because I don't have more discretion about telling people stupid stories about Opal.

But then Laura Towle said her heart was "strangely warmed" by my accounts of Opal, and she opened her life to me and shared a story about how her cat scratches at the bedroom door. I thought this was the beginning of a deeper relationship, and if friendship evangelism goes as planned, I'll be sharing the gospel with her soon.

I promised to confront Naomi about her sins in her comments section, but I'm having second thoughts. In addition to not sinning myself, perceiving other peoples' sins, and writing about animals in a kitchy voice, I am blessed with the gift of discerning other peoples' maturity levels. I just don't think Naomi is ready to face her shadow self yet. I don't want to throw my pearls before swine, so I'm just going to hold on to my insights until I think she's ready to really appreciate them. (And Naomi, I'm sorry about the comparison between you and a pig, but Jesus said it, not me).

Speaking of wasting money, does anyone want to buy my ebay crap? It's all out of my aunt's attic, and it's lovely. Macrame yarn, old Christian books, a bottle cutter from the 70s... The crazy thing is that I sell almost everything I put on there. When crap is in a box at a garage sale, it looks like crap. When crap is on a digital picture on the computer, it looks like treasure.

Peace to you all today. May God grant us all the grace to know crap from treasure.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, February 21, 2004

Will you marry me?

My house is so messy I think it might actually smell bad. I am An Intellectual, and it's hard to leave the fascinating world of my own mind to deal with these messy material things. If I just had a wife, then my house would be clean.

I need to waterproof my boots, get my tires rotated, pay taxes, and make something for a potluck tonight. And, obviously, I need to clean my house.

Be on the lookout, everyone, for a comments section in Naomi's blog. I've been saving up some personal confrontations and grudges, and plan to let loose in her comments section asap (another creative twist on Mt. 18).

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, February 20, 2004

Colleen, There is a Fat Separator in Gilead

Mary Ellen Ashcroft spoke at Bethel chapel yesterday on temptation and sin (she wrote Temptations Women Face). She said that when you experience envy, you should not run from it, but rather look more closely at it. Ask yourself whether the thing you want is worth going after, or whether you should release the desire and move on. She invited us to meditate on our envy, and the thing that came to my mind was that I envy people who have fat separators. I decided to focus on getting this thing. It has to be the Truedau fat separator (the best according to Cook’s Illustrated)– I found it on-line, but shipping adds 50% to the price (it’s 9.99). I need to find it at a store.

The Lord spoke to me last night and answered my question about bodies and death. (Remember, if a monologue begins with ‘The Lord spoke to me’, then you can’t disagree with it.) I think death is a separation from one’s own body, and people will get their bodies back at the final reconciliation. I think it’s really important what we do with dead bodies, and how we care for them, because the body is a real part of the person we loved. It is a real and substantive link to our beloved dead, not just a meaningless shell. Jim Hurd, a fellow anthropologist, says that in most cultures, “the dead are near; they are not far.” Most cultures have ways of keeping the beloved dead close, or of communicating with them in various ways. I am sad that my Baptist tradition has nearly discarded the notion of the communion of the saints – that our beloved dead brethren continue on with us in God’s kingdom, in some mysterious way. I think the dead no longer suffer from their earthly trials, but that they, along with us, long to be made complete – they’re still building the kingdom with us – we’re just in two different eras of life eternal. The other profs with whom I discussed this yesterday said this is a classical/typical theological question, but I had never thought about it before. They mentioned what Jimmy said – that for Hebrews, the human is an ensouled body. For Greeks, the human is an embodied soul.

If you think I’m really wrong, as in heretically wrong, then let me know. If it’s within the bounds of orthodoxy, and if none of you have objections, I’d like to picture things working this way because it makes me feel better. I won’t get dogmatic about it.

Is it a sin to hide candy?
This morning's sermon on KKMS (Glen Loury, I think) was about how we need to stop sinning (an innovative topic for the fundamentalists). He said to take a half-day to write about your sins before the Lord. Write about the things you do that facilitate sin, "like hiding alcohol, hiding bad video games, or hiding candy." I hide candy all the time - if I don't, someone else might take it. Sometimes I hide it so well I forget where I put it, and it's a pleasant surprise to find it. Apparently I am so self-deceived I didn't even realize this was a sin. I'm going to go read Leviticus - I think there's something in there about the abomination that is hidden chocolate.

College Students Say the Darndest Things
“OK, Dr. Paris, no more tears. I won’t cry about the project for your class anymore.”


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, February 19, 2004

God doesn't give a rip about your knees
Yesterday I listened to a Chuck Swindoll sermon, and today I heard another radio sermon about knees. I'm a little embarrassed to write about it, but you might as well know: conventional evangelicalism is my crack - I can't stay away from the stuff. The man today said to strengthen your weak knees so you can run to the finish line, which is heaven (from Hebrews 12). "God doesn't give a rip about your knees! This is a spiritual point. He'd rather have your legs cut off in heaven than to be a two-legged person in hell!" Chuck Swindoll said that the body and spirit are like hand and glove - the body is just a shell, a glove, and the soul is what is really real.

This is more Greek than Gospel - Plato made a distinction between the spiritual (which is real and good) and the physical (which is bad and illusion). Western Christians have chopping up the wholeness of God's creation ever since, splitting it all into spiritual and physical. I also think the glove analogy is too strongly reminiscent of OJ.

This new emerging wholistic Christianty says the body does really matter - it's more than just a glove, and God does give a rip about it. What are the implications of a holistic view of the person for our theology of dead people? I'm thinking about this in two ways.

First, what is a dead body? Perhaps it is more than just a shell - maybe it is a real part of the person, and we have one more chance to express care and love for their personhood in the way we care for their dead body. Maybe care for the body is a real part of our relationship with them.

Second, are the dead really complete and perfect? Or do they long to be reconciled with their bodies? Hebrews 11 gives a long list of people who carried God's promise through this world - Abraham, Rahab, Moses, etc. In v. 39 it says, "though they were commended for their faith, they did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better so that they would not, apart from us, be made perfect." Maybe we all - living and dead - are waiting for the final reconciliation of all things when we all will be together, and we all will be whole (body, mind, soul, and spirit). Christians like to say that the dead are perfectly happy, dancing in the golden streets and singing their favorite Porch songs. Maybe they are in God's presence (in a different way than the living are), but still are longing for wholeness.

What do you think? I"m going to think about these things today and write more tomorrow. The questions came to me this morning as I was in a right-wing-sermon-induced haze.

Final question: Is it vulgar to say "give a rip"? I'm thinking of calling into the station and offering some judgmental criticism of preachers using worldly language.


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, February 18, 2004

Does Anybody Really Know What Time it is?
I, too, have been thinking about the Holy No. I tried to help many people in my years of urban ministry. Some people were easy to help because they took the help, improved themselves, and moved on with life. Others took advantage of help, and, as Rachel mentioned, needed boundaries and eventual 'tough love' (stop doling out the help and let people bear the consequences of their own choices). I think you need to know someone really well to know whether or not that's what is going on. Still others were the saddest kind of urban poor - those unable to take an opportunity, those unable to help themselves. These folks, mostly substance addicts, and a few social service addicts, were, in my eyes, the poorest of the American poor. In the words of the beatitudes, their spirits had been crushed and they were no longer happy or blessed. For these folks, our ministry (in D.C.) truly became like Mother Theresa's - hospice. Part of our love is carrying the mortally wounded through this life and comforting them until the end, all the while holding out hope and offering prayers for change and restoration. Of course, I see all these facets of humanity in each of my college classes as well, even down to students who, on an essay, really want help, or just want me to do it for them.

As both KP and Rachel said, it's exhausting to help in the wrong ways, or to help too much. (And it's no coincidence that it is women who are having most of this conversation, as many of us were socialized to be care-taking co-dependents!). As the church, we aren't only a community that helps, we must also be a community that helps each other figure out what it is to help.

What I really wanted to point out, tho, is how blogging creates knowledge in a way consistent with our postmodern time. PM evangelical theologians (back to Nancey Murphey here!) say knowledge is not built in a linear, neat fashion - like a building constructed on foundations. Rather, it's like a web, without beginning or end. God (and True Truth, or Reality), in my view, exists both in and beyond, before and after, our web of life and knowledge. We, from our divergent points of view and histories, are piecing together knowledge about our world as best we can.

That's the philosophy lesson of the day, and I'm no philosopher, so woe to you who take it as Truth!

Tell me why
Why, in your opinion, does Laura Towle read this blog but never say hello in the comment section?

P.S.
I'm searching for links until the shower is available, which it now is. Maybe I should edit my blog instead of linking.

The sun is coming up again today. We will have light, and maybe some other good things will happen, too!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, February 17, 2004

First Things First
If you truly have nothing to do at work, watch this lady comb her cat (click on "Combing Cat").

Where is your Self?
I've found that work is a place of freedom, and church a place of constraint. At work, it's safe to be myself, express my gifts, and let others know my personality. At church, it's better to check your brains and gifts at the door. Your behaviors will be evaluated, your speech judged, your family inspected, and your gifts siphoned off for someone else's agenda. The people in power freak out when threatened, so best to just leave them alone.

I enjoy work because, thankfully, I have a job that makes use of my gifts. I am encouraged to be smart, expressive, creative, and appropriately competitive. I have a creative playspace in the world of ideas, and I'm allowed to roam more-or-less free (Internet blocking excepted). I feel much more comfortable and liked at work than anywhere else in my life.

When I started coming to Solomon's Porch without my husband most of the time, I was afraid people would judge me. Instead, they said, "Attend church without your husband? That's nothing! Listen to these problems we've got..." A second moment of insecurity was when I preached. I felt more exposed than usual because I was really expressing my gifts - thinking, reading, writing and speaking is what I love to do, and I was afraid people would be displeased, hurt, intimidated, or just not like me. It has been a blessing to feel that people received my gifts as, in fact, gifts. It has also been a blessing to be part of SP for the most difficult three years of my life, and have the freedom to not be as giving, productive, and energetic as I would normally be. I'm wary of believing that church can be a place of space, creativity, and rest. It seems like there must be a closet somewhere that, when opened, will pour forth judging, moralizing, and eternal damning.

Yesterday I was sad, and I was grateful for the amusement of blogs, and the knowledge that some of you were thinking of me and of each other and taking the time to write to each other. Hmmm, perhaps I was just burdened with the weight of Jimmy's sin (there's that spiritual gift of mine again!)

Note to self: When sadness comes, embrace lots of it, and some of our fellow humans who carry it. And be grateful. You are loved, and you have love to give. This is a blessing.

College Students Say the Darndest Things
"I don't know...it's kind of hard to be around Christians when you're going through something hard. First, they make you feel like an alien. Then, they find reasons to blame you for whatever you're going through. In my hardest times, I wish I had gone to a secular school where I could have found more support."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, February 16, 2004

The Total Depravity of Jimmy

One of the things I like about Solomon's Porch is that I have opportunities to exercise my spiritual gifts. One of my greatest spiritual gifts (and I have many) is the ability to perceive other peoples' sins. A related gift is that I don't sin very much, which is a great complement to the first one. I'd like to use this blog to call out peoples' sins, even before talking with them personally. I know, I know, you're thinking, "Hey, Jenell, what about Matthew 18?" My approach, however, isn't so much a violation of Matthew 18 as a creative twist.

I was at a birthday party for a woman, let's call her "Carla", given by her husband who we'll call "Jimmy." Let's even say that "Carla" wrote a "children's book" recently. Now, also by way of introduction, I must mention that Jimmy has many wonderful qualities. Just a brief list of three: wanting others to like liturgy, talking about the liturgy at his last church, and reading out loud from a Jean Vanier book. He's a great guy! Well, at this party, he started ranting about Carla's book. He claims that he wrote much of the book but didn't get credit for it. People were sort of embarrassed for him, because if he had written it, obviously his name would be on the cover (which it isn't). He brought the book over to me and a few other people and said (again), "I wrote some of this!" "Like this page, for example," and he flipped through the book. "Well, I can't find any of my stuff right now," he concluded. "But we wrote some little rhymes together like, um, um, um, Jesus is the cheese-uzz..." There was an awkward silence and then he said, "well, that's not a very good one."

"Jesus is the cheese-uzz?" Jimmy, that doesn't even mean anything! It was obvious to everyone that not only did Jimmy not write the book, but he also can't rhyme, and he is COVETOUS. I thought maybe it was avarice, but really, it's covetousness, wanting something that isn't his.

The book is for children. With Carla, it's all for the kids. Jimmy, why not just help the children, and let your tall tales go?

P.S. Let me know if this "calling out the sins of the brethren" works well. Maybe we could try it at church sometimes. The important thing is to do it without forewarning, so the person can really be convicted of their sins without a chance to repent ahead of time.



Peace and love to everyone today. I'm working at home, and then teaching about racism and white privilege tonight - always an uplifting topic.

P.S.S. Please please please don't write me a comment that makes me explain the genre of this post!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?