Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Some Thoughts That Need to Get Out of My Head

Senior Christianity Today editor Agnieszka Tennant writes a personal essay about her use and recent dis-use of the birth control pill. I read it in this month's print issue, and didn’t see it up yet at CT online. She used the pill for several years, and has recently decided to stop using it because of its abortifacient potential, and because she wants to be open to whatever God may bring through her marriage. She was influenced in part by Amy Laura Hall, (ethicist at Duke) and I also read her new article in Books and Culture, about Protestants and family planning. Though neither spoke directly to my life or choices, I felt tense while reading them. My entanglement in reproductive technologies is fresh in my past, and I remember well the anxiety of trying to make wise choices with incomplete information, complex technologies, potential consequences both seen and unseen, incredibly expensive options, and a driving desire to have a baby. It reminded me that while sexuality is banal in our culture, it still is a holy, gentle part of life. When we speak of what other people ought to do or not do, if we really feel we must speak at all, it should be with grace and an acknowledgment of how much we can’t understand of others’ lives.

I liked Tennant’s voice in the article, because she speaks for herself and explains her own reasoning with an appropriate level of disclosure about her context. I do, however, disagree with the central principle of her argument, that “the miniscule chance that my womb might turn away a cluster of 128 or 256 cells knitted together in the image of God” is reason enough to stop using hormonal contraception. This argument comes from the fear that hormonal methods including the pill, patch, and the IUD thin the uterine lining. Though they prevent ovulation most of the time, a break-through ovulation that is fertilized may be prevented from implanting. Experts disagree about whether or not this occurs (imagine the experiment that would watch for the uterine rejection of a fertilized egg in women who rarely ovulate). Women using hormonal methods do successfully carry pregnancies, so it may be that when an unexpected fertilization occurs, the body “catches up” the uterus before implantation. No one really knows. It is ethically consistent for an absolutist pro-lifer to not use hormonal contraception, due to this possibility, but I don’t think it is a necessary position. Tennant is not saying that everyone needs to believe or do as she believes and does, but many who share her position do.

That’s a digression - my real focus here is that I like the way Tennant’s theological argument is set within the context of her life. She cites Sam and Bethany Torode, authors of Open Embrace, who write similarly. They each tell us of their thoughts and choices at a particular point in their journey (all are relatively young, relatively newly married, at the beginning of family-making when they write). I wonder, especially on reproductive ethics, about the personal lives of ethicists and other spokespersons and how their personal journeys influence their scholarship. It’s all too easy for someone to forbid the pill, or fertility technologies, or other such things, after they no longer have a stake in the situation. It’s all too easy to forbid others from doing something that you don’t really understand, and that you aren’t interested in doing, anyway. I find that people often develop rational, theological justifications for what they wanted to do anyway. An infertile couple may choose to adopt, and explain it in terms of Christian ethics, but they were also concerned about passing on the husband’s genetic mental illness – adoption fit both their ethics and their context. Another couple may remain childless, and explain it in terms of overpopulation, consistent with the environmental values they held before they discovered their infertility. Often, what sound like disembodied, universal ethics really are housed in the complex stories of our particular lives. Our values do shape choices, but they also help justify or explain choices after the fact, help us construct meaningful narratives out of life events, and help us evade the real complexities of our stories.

Fertility and infertility decisions are fraught with ethical complexities, and having some of them faced them myself, I am not prepared to offer a universalized ethic. Well, I guess I’d say that God makes people, and God loves life, and we ought to treat life and people with great care. Then I’d allow each person to make choices within the context of their own life and community, and answer to God for themselves.

I’m nervous about church bodies or large organizations making blanket, detailed statements about how Christians ought to approach contraception, IVF, and other reproductive technologies. The anti-contraceptive philosophy exacts the greatest cost from women, and it carries great consequences for women’s abilities to further the kingdom of God in ways other than mothering. It also influences how high-school and college-age women view the breadth of their giftedness and the meaning of their time spent in college. Infertility is a stress similar to cancer or AIDS (studies have shown this), and is incredibly complicated. The technologies are myriad and rapidly changing, and each family’s story is set in the context of their own hopes and dreams, physical and mental health, marital stability, and finances, among other factors. Church bodies and authorities shouldn’t use their ideological power to shame, goad, or religiously coerce people, especially in areas where many prognosticators don’t even understand the technologies or the human journey of using them.

Contraceptive and reproductive ethics need to honor the tender hopes, dashed dreams, and complex lives of real people. The slippery slope leading to euthanasia, abortion, cloning, and the rest should not be held back by asking infertile couples to disavow fertility technologies, or by asking women to bear an outrageous number of pregnancies. Instead of judge or jury, people of faith should be witnesses, announcing the love and favor they have received from God, reminding everyone that they are loved by a God who is close at hand. We can say that God loves life - miscarried lives, aborted lives, stillborn lives, and the lives of desired babies who never were even conceived (they exist, too, in the hopes and hearts of their parents). We could also help people be well-informed, and help them form networks of intimate relationships, both of which will help people make and own their own choices.

9 Comments:

  • I think you have great insight here and though infertility isn't part of my life, I have often been so angered by how the church assumes a position of moral dictate.

    Thank you for writing this.

    By Blogger Rachie Rach and the Funky Bunch, at 12:16 PM  

  • jenell, this is excellent. you capture so many facets so quickly and with much grace. as someone who has spent most of her adult life terrified of getting pregnant and simultaneously guilty for not being willing to take on more children or pregnancies, something about this adds peace to my soul. thanks for offering it.

    By Anonymous jen lemen, at 10:56 PM  

  • I'm glad you have this outlet to get thoughts out of your head. I've let my CT subscription lapse, but I'll be sure to look up Agnieszka's piece.

    For a while I've been pretty much on board with AL Hall's scepticism about assisted reproductive technologies, but your description here helped me recognize that that's at least as much about my discomfort with subjecting my own body to the discomfort of such treatment as it is about any conviction about global resource allocation.

    I frame this as my own choice, not a magisterial pronouncement, but I now see that by describing it as a global resource issue, I suggest a moral judgment against those who choose differently. I drive a car and eat meat, so I'm aware of the hypocrisy of a selective application of a global resource argument. But that doesn't necessarily come across in a careless comment.

    Rachel from NC
    (long-time fan and lurker)

    By Blogger Rachel, at 9:03 AM  

  • Could there be a more fundamental question in this matter that is never addressed? I refer to the fact that such discussions always turn to a definition of 'life' that is couched in the physical, not in the realm of Jesus' words "that you might have life and have it more abundantly."

    It is a strong conviction of mine that the church has been grossly remiss in not addressing itself to 'life' as a manner of being as opposed to defaulting to a discussion of life as the physical being.

    I am the father of four, and a former pastor, but I have little problem with the concept of abortion. I do not support abortion as a casual matter of birth control, but I do support the right of a woman to choose (at least prior to the final trimester) to not birth a child for which she believes that she and the child would suffer.

    I encourage, even implore' that those of you who read this will measure your positions by asking whether you are addressing life at the physical level alone, or whether you have found in the scriptures a greater definition of life.

    I offer this comment as 'food for thought'. I happened on this blog while seeking a place to discuss Christian Ethics in general, but could not pass through without a brief comment.

    By Anonymous Harry R. Edwards, at 7:40 AM  

  • A humbling piece for me to read; as a childless man who has changed his ethical positions on these issues like other folks change shoes, you make good sense here --powerfully good.

    And yes, our personal lives do matter. That's always been at the heart of feminist ethics -- who we are, and how we live in our bodies, inevitably shapes our perception of what others should do with their bodies.

    It is invariably dangerous to try to deny to others what is no longer a viable alternative for oneself.

    By Blogger Hugo, at 6:02 PM  

  • Another death essay penalty Resource... LifeLaw.org . A discussion forum for all that deals with such hot-button issues as death essay penalty .

    By Blogger TheDevilIsInTheDetails, at 7:04 PM  

  • Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a anxiety disorder social symptom site/blog. It pretty much covers ##KEYWORD## related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:20 AM  

  • "The anti-contraceptive philosophy exacts the greatest cost from women, and it carries great consequences for women’s abilities to further the kingdom of God in ways other than mothering. It also influences how high-school and college-age women view the breadth of their giftedness and the meaning of their time spent in college."
    Didn't Jesus say that in order to achieve the kingdom of God on has to be ready to give up everything, even mother and father?
    I see two problems with your reasoning here: First, is the assumption that one can (and should) divorce sex from procreation; second, is the insistance that women shouldn't have to make sacrifices for the kindgom of God. But I don't see anywhere in the Bible where we are promised that living a holy life is easy.
    And it seems clear to me that fertility is a gift from God. The first command of God to Adam and Eve was" be fruitful and multiply. Didn't God design us and our sexuality for that as an end?

    Of course, women can and should further the kingdom of God in ways other than mothering, but where this seems selfish to me is to insist on being a sexual being and yet refusing to accept the fruits of sexuality that God gives.
    It is possible for a healthy, well-adjusted woman to live without sex. If I don't want to be a mother, that is what I will do. However if I accept God's gift of sexuality,I feel I should accept it in it's totality, with the children that might possibly arrive as a consequence of my actions. Anything else would be playing God.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:28 PM  

  • Interesting blog...

    Regarding whether we can really know if the thinned lining has an effect on implantation...I believe Randy Alcorn (www.epm.org) has documented that ectopic pregnancies--where uterine lining is not an issue--are not decreased in women using mini-pills. This lends support to the concept that mini-pills do not inhibit ovulation at all, but rather work primarily by inhibiting implantation.

    By Blogger Jenn, at 1:22 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, October 24, 2005

Quick post

Would you like to subscribe to The Utne Reader? I'm renewing, and they gave me an offer - when I renew, I can sign up 6 more people for only $10 each. If you'd like to give me (or mail me) $10, I'll add you to my list. E-mail me to let me know (jparis@bethel.edu).

1 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Good Things That Have Happened Recently

See photos - all good stuff.

I organized a closet today. It is the sewing supplies/sheets/piano music closet.

I bought Halloween candy and 2 pacifiers for only $8 (sale and coupon).

An article has been accepted for publication. After four rejections and three years spent waiting on editors...it's about time!

I'm re-reading Repenting of Religion and am learning even more than the first time. I have a few things to repent of, including religion, but that's a subject for a more sober post.

1 Comments:

  • I was just browsing various blogs as I was doing a search on the word halloween, and I just wanted to say that I really like what you've done with your blog, even though it wasn't particularly related to what I searched for. I appreciate your postings, and your blog is a good example of how a blog should be done. I've only just recently started a Posters website - feel free to visit it when you get a chance if you wish. Much success, antonio.

    By Blogger Antonio Hicks, at 7:52 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


So dear!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


big river, big sky. We went to the Mississippi (Coon Rapids Dam) yesterday.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home


Here we all are (I'm with ollie, James with Wesley)

1 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, October 17, 2005

A Serial Conversation

Thank you, njdt, for clarifying mtbt who clarified wjb. And nice mention of your Books and Culture article in the Bethel Focus.

I am glad to understand "vetted." I can now make a well-informed decision to exclude it from my vocabulary. I will listen to the word when used by others, and I will respond to a sentence in which "vetted" is present, but I will not introduce the word in a conversation.

I never planned to use "nee" verbally, but now the question "What does nee mean" can stop replaying in my mind like an ABBA song every time I read the obituaries.

Thank you, my vocabulary betters. Is it a problem that three people who know more words than me used to be students at Bethel? Two were at least smart enough to avoid my classes. The other one took a class just to meet me so she could offer me some editorial help.

Today's post:
Please forgive me if I seem frightened by you, am at a loss for words, or doze off while you’re talking. Having babies has ruined my conversational abilities, mediocre as they were. When an adult looks me in the eyes and says something, I freeze like a deer in the headlights. I speak more slowly than I used to, because I can't remember words of more than one syllable. I remember that I used to know the words, but I have to search for them. I feel exposed, afraid that my conversation partner will expect something more than “naa”, “n-gaa” or “ee-bah.” And then the conversation lasts so darn long.

In my world, we say “naaa” and “ee-bah”, and our conversations last about 15 seconds. We stare at each other alot and always feel safe. We like to not wear all our clothes. I’ve lost touch with the world outside of this.

Here’s an example of a conversation from Friday night that is one of about four adult conversations I had all last week. It really gave me some things to reflect on.

Jimmy: MJ gets up every night – we don’t sleep through.
Jenell: What does she do?
Jimmy: She wakes up btw 2:45-3.
Jenell: What does she do when she wakes up? Does she cry, fuss, or is she hungry? What does she do?
Jimmy: We know she isn't hungry.
Jenell: Then what do you do?
Jimmy: Well, I pick her up like this, and then I creep away like this, and then we hope she’ll sleep, and sometimes she’s only up for 2 minutes, and sometimes 5, and sometimes 10, and sometimes 45.
Kerry: Z sleeps 12 hours at a time.
Dave: I went to the doctor and he said I can never have children. It's because I’m a man. I’m serial.
Jenell: What do you feed Z? Is he eating solids yet? Or still milk? And any formula? TELL ME TELL ME THIS IS FASCINATING!!! (mental dialogue: “Remember to tell James that Z is really cute”)
Kerry: Babies sleep through the night when they’re able to.
Jenell: Mine sleep 4 hours at a time, sometimes 5, sometimes 6, sometime 7. It used to be 3, but now it’s more. (Turn to Ollie) Oh don’t you baby, oh don’t you? Oh look at you, look at you, look at you! (Turn to Wesley) Eeebah, nggaa, a-goooo.
Dave: So, Dr. Paris, are you writing any books?
Jenell: Huh?
Jimmy: What are we talking about? Dave’s “100% hemp” hat logo is distracting me.
Dave: Well, what do you expect from a high school drop out? I did work at IBM though. I’m serial.

4 Comments:

  • Oh, I didn't even know that I was being edited by Nate and Marie (oops I just outed their secret identities). But I guess if I'm going to offer vocabularical (do not look this word up) assistance, then I should check to make sure I'm awake and not accidentally writing "friend" when I write the completely unrelated word "french".
    And apparently I need to get my french roots down pat before I go a-blogging.

    By Blogger whb, at 9:56 AM  

  • you are so funny!

    katie

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:41 PM  

  • thank you for writing this. My hope is that when people see that your formidable brain has turned to mush they will believe that nine years ago I, too, had interesting things to say and that my present state of conversational inneptitude should not be seen as representative of my overall intellegence. At least I hope it's not.

    By Anonymous carla, at 10:06 AM  

  • I always thought Dave was saying that he was "cereal".

    By Blogger Brad, at 12:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Assortment.

For KP, a link to a Christian graphic novel, MARKED

Two words I don’t understand, though I’ve seen them many times. Please advise.

“vetted” From context, this seems to be used in political talk, and in editorial-speak. Someone at Bethel used it a lot to talk about our lectures in a team-taught class. She used this word for three years on a team with me, and I was always too embarrassed to ask what it meant, and too lazy to look it up. Seems to be about evaluating, or assessing?

“nee” Like my death-averse mother, I read the obituaries sometimes on weekends. If I were dead, it would read “Jenell Paris (nee Williams)” Seems to mean “maiden name”? but why? What kind of word is it?

Today’s list: Five questions raised in my family (of origin) regarding my boys’ sexuality, health, and violent tendencies. All questions have been posed since this morning.

1. Will Wesley’s apparent introversion make him more prone to kill his mother?
2. Do I change their diapers too infrequently, and does sitting in one’s own waste predispose one to become homosexual?
3. Will asparteme give them brain cancer?
4. Will soy make them gay?
5. Why is Oliver’s head so big?

No conclusions yet to any - feel free to offer your perspective.

9 Comments:

  • Vetted means, roughly, run by or tested. For example I vetted the list of candidates to see who was worthy.
    Nee is the friend word for born (feminine form). So an obituary would list Jane Doe (nee Johnson).

    By Blogger whb, at 1:46 PM  

  • 1. Instead of making him want to kill his mother, his introversion will make him gay.
    2. I don't know about the changing, but being gay is directly related to the love of "scat".
    3. Thankfully asparteme does not cause brain cancer but does cause the onset of gayness.
    4.Soy has three letters and ends in y, so yes, it does lead to being gay.
    5.Because he will be gay and gay men have big heads.

    (Duh, all of these answers are so obvious!)

    -Andrea

    p.s. haven't commented in awhile, have been in and out of lurkdom, but glad your babies are doing well and you are well too!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:04 PM  

  • whb meant to say that nee is from the french word for birth- naissance...conjugated nee

    By Anonymous mtbt, at 4:59 PM  

  • Who is mtbt, and how does mtbt know what whb (I know who he is) meant? A hint will suffice.

    By Blogger Jenell, at 5:14 PM  

  • darn, i was excited to tell you that nee is indeed french and means something like "born"

    i am excited to look at this graphic novel!

    By Blogger kp, at 6:12 PM  

  • response to graphic novel...yeesh!

    By Blogger kp, at 9:42 AM  

  • Yeesh indeed! I don't think that graphic novel is going on my must-buy Christmas list.

    And isn't "vetted" something you do to your pets?
    I done gone and vetted the kitties yesterday and the doc gaved them all sorts of hairball-stopping shot-thingies. :)

    By Anonymous Rachel, at 11:01 AM  

  • As a verb (according to one online dictionary): to vet was originally a horse-racing term, referring to the requirement that a horse be checked for health and soundness by a veterinarian before being allowed to race. Thus, it has taken the general meaning "to check": "The attorney vetted the documents before using them to make his case."

    I think it is 19th-century in origin.

    Troy

    By Blogger Chicken Pax, at 5:16 PM  

  • mtbt: Marie T Balsley Taylor

    whb said "friend word" when he meant "french word."

    mtbt sat with whb through several french classes.

    -njdt-

    By Anonymous Nathaniel Taylor, at 7:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, October 09, 2005

Paris Project: The Column

In this month's The Atlantic Monthly, Alex Beam writes about blogs and other forms of unpublished journalism: "Self-publishing is waking up in the morning, turning on your computer, and sharing your thoughts with the hypothetically limitless audience of the Internet...so many people are doing it, it's hardly worth doing at all." Bah, Mr. Beam! If so many people are doing it, then why not join them?

I am enamoured with essays, and am working on improving my essay writing skills. (Should I have written "enamoured by essays"? Dammit, this is a poor start.) I would like, someday, to have a column in a magazine. The publishing and networking that may have to happen to reach that goal will probably take some time, perhaps even many years. The writing and the joy of sharing with an audience, however, can begin now. My plan is to write one essay per month, and use this blog as a "monthly column" space one day per month. Then, at sabbatical's end, I'll have 9 or 10 essays that I can continue editing and perhaps publish on paper. Rest assured, the drivel you've come to expect here will continue on other days.

A word on your opinions: feel free to express critical comments here, or if you have lengthy feelings or ideas about my ideas or my writing, send an e-mail. I take criticism in and mull it over, and it never hurts my feelings for more than a day or two, a necessary and totally acceptable part of the process.

Today is the launching of Paris Project: The Column. Here goes.

Three Percent Short

One time I earned a ninety seven on a paper in college. Upset, I went to the professor and asked, “Why did I get those three points taken off?” Now a professor myself, I cringe when this question comes at me, at least a few times each semester. Straight A students who fret about the few points they didn’t earn are typically easy to hurt and impossible to satisfy. The professor said something about it being a very good paper and how I should be pleased with my A. The following year, when I became a teaching assistant for this professor, I realized while recording grades that he never gave perfect scores. In his classes, ninety five was a solid A, and ninety seven was an excellent A. With each set of grades, I wondered: if there are one hundred points, shouldn’t each of them be earnable? I thought so then, and I still do; now I give the occasional hundred, though he likely still doesn’t.

It’s been fifteen years since that semester, and now I’m staying up past midnight with babies instead of study groups. Since the birth of my twins four months ago, sleep has been scarce, but I recently started getting enough of the deep kind to start having dreams again, several of which have had me reliving small mistakes from the distant past. An old roommate appeared in a dream and, as she did ten years ago, said I ate toast too frequently. An old boyfriend appeared to break up with me. Another roommate left a voicemail to everyone in our household saying, “Whoever pretends to wash dishes and then puts them away – please do a better job.” In my dream as in the real past, I knew the message was for me; I left cheese on the grater that day as I rushed to leave the kitchen. The ninety seven resurfaced as well.

I rarely put stock in my dreams, but I think these are sending me a message. In each of these situations, I was very good – a top student, a solid roommate, a beloved girlfriend – but less than perfect. That my mind dredges up these situations years later suggests that my bitty failures have stuck with me over the years, perhaps even more than my successes. Becoming a mother has roused my familiar fears -- I’m desperately trying to measure up, but am doomed. It’s all or nothing, and I am nothing.

But how am I really doing as a mother? My babies are plump and getting plumper, laughing themselves silly every day, and developmentally on track. They’re washed, fed, and loved. My husband is pleased with me. I’m happy. If I could grade my mothering so far, I’d assign myself, oh, a ninety seven.

On too many days, I worry over that last three percent more than I rejoice over the ninety seven percent. I tell myself that if I could mother perfectly — if I really loved my babies – it would look like this. My full attention would be focused on the babies every moment they are awake. I would perfectly intuit what they need and would play with them, offer them toys, or let them rest. I would be at their beck and call, and would never disappoint. I would clean the house, cook meals, feed myself, and perhaps even work out, during the night while they’re asleep. I wouldn’t sleep but an hour or two every other day.

Then, on the days that seem perfect – babies are happy, I’m well-rested, and the household is harmonious -- I adjust the standard so I still can’t earn those last few points. I could have baked a pie, visited a friend, or written an article. I could matched the babies’ socks to their onesies. I could have done some extra work to salt away funds for the future therapy they’ll need to heal from the indiscernible but indelible psychic harm I am causing them everyday.

This mother’s urge to be perfect might come from our culture, or perhaps from nature. In the West, the Industrial revolution killed cottage industries, and men were forced to leave their families all day to go to work. As men’s work became increasingly dirty, both literally and metaphorically, the home was elevated as a haven from the public world. Women were the “angels of the hearth”, keepers of the morality, cleanliness, and comfort that men desperately needed to return to at the end of a day. And from nature, anthropologists say that new mothers’ excessive worrying is necessary for the survival of the species. Infancy is a dangerous time, when the littlest humans can’t direct their flailing limbs even to defend themselves. Maternal hypervigilance saves lives (someone ought to make a bumpersticker of that!).

This would be fine and good, if my worries were actually focused on my children. Of course, I do watch out for dangling miniblind cords, bad drivers, and aspirin on the floor. I also worry about ways in which my problems – my anger, impatience, unresolved childhood issues, and the like – will affect my boys. I also, unfortunately, waste a good measure of my worry thinking about myself, and how I don’t measure up. Martyr that I am, I make it seem as though it’s all about them, when really, it’s all about my desire to build my sense of self though my own effort.

The truth is that even when I’m at my best, my boys will still experience pain, loneliness, hunger, fatigue, and sadness. Sometimes I’ll even be the one who has wronged them. Life is hard, and instead of shielding them from it, I could be their guide. We can learn together how to experience pain and survive; how to be afraid and take courage; how to be wronged and forgive. If I continue striving for perfection, I’ll become a sad, angry mother, and will be alarmed when I inadvertently pass on my perfectionism to them, which will surely happen.

Grace may be perfection’s opposite. We hurt each other, but we forgive and try again. We fail ourselves, but don’t give up on ourselves. We can do this because we know we are loved – by God, our families, and ourselves. Instead of marching carefully through life like trained soldiers, grace frees us to run loose. I want to watch my boys live large, take risks, and have great adventures. I'd like to see myself do the same.

I was glad to finish graduate school and be through with grades. When I received my doctoral diploma in the mail, I held it and rejoiced that never again would someone tell me what to read or write and then tell me how well I had done it. I do enjoy creating my own reading lists and writing projects, but the grading continues. I make the scale, and can never make one hundred. (Usually I earn an A-, unless I’m washing dishes and, due to grade inflation, eke out a C).

If I could speak to the student who stood in her professor’s office asking after those three lost points, I would say, “Let the three points go. In fact, let the other ninety seven points go, too. The prize is not the grade, but what you learned.” That young woman wouldn’t have listened, but this older young woman will. The points don’t matter, not the ones I earn or the ones I fail to earn. Most college students will say that the best parts of college – friendships, romances, dorm life, and even studying -- happened outside the classroom, free from a professor’s evaluating eyes. It’s still true, years after college, that love, joy, fun, relaxation, and learning flourish in the spaces where judgment of others and judgment of ourselves are set aside, and we choose the freedom -- that was always there for the choosing -- to simply live.

18 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, October 03, 2005

Stale jokes

I'm pretty sure the marginal humor from my crushes has deflated in the days since I posted, but I just want to say to Carla and Lisa that Gene Hackman and Robert Duvall are my only old man crushes. Just becuase I like, say, Will Smith, doesn't mean I also like Flava Flav (which I don't). Like rappers, old man are not interchangeable.

I also should say that I'm not all that interested in Dirty Dancing. I've seen it about three times and watched the E! True Hollywood Story about it twice, but that's all. It is on ALL THE TIME during the day, and because I don't watch soaps, there's sometimes nothing else to watch between 11-3. And the last year has included alot of daytime TV for me. I also watched The Blue Lagoon (about 30 minutes of it) for the first time recently. It was forbidden to me and my sister, and I expected it to be a bit more lurid...but then, it would have been had I seen it at age 12. I watched them being flummoxed about being pregnant and nursing.

Hmmm...nothing else on my mind. I have brownies in the oven, and want to make some cookies. I'm reading Cook's ILlustrated Cookie Book, which says the butter needs to be at 65 degrees, everything else at room temp. My butter is 59 right now - I'm sticking a thermometer in it to see what 65 feels like. I'm also trying a shiny tin baking sheet. Then it's sweets for the week for me! Believe me, food is a whole different situation when you're home all the time, and can't just run into a store. If I'm at the gas station and wanted a treat, I'd have to get the stroller and both babies out, and then put them back in the car. I just bake it all at home instead, which leaves me more open to husband commentary. I miss having my office where I could keep chocolate in my desk. If I didn't say anything about my TA having some now and then, she wouldn't say anything about it being there.

3 Comments:

  • I think there's an age threshold for Dirty Dancing - not that you can't enjoy it at any age, but that you need to have seen it before the age of, say, 14 to really love it. Like, it has to be part of the fabric of your adolescence (or pre-adolescence) for it to be a part of you. I wasn't allowed to watch it until I was 17, so the first time I saw it was in a college film course (not at Bethel..). I couldn't believe how inane it was, and I still cannot get over the fact that her nickname is "Baby." What is up with that?

    -Kim VB

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:28 PM  

  • Well, I'M still laughing about the crush list, especially (!) Shawn Cassidy. Don't you really think there are two kinds of girls in the world - those who had crushes on Shawn Cassidy and those who had crushes on his brother, What's-His-Name?

    By Blogger juniper68, at 12:14 AM  

  • David Cassidy was for kids a bit older than me. He's making a comeback these days, but in a rather uncrushable way.

    By Blogger Jenell, at 11:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?