Thursday, October 23, 2008

Waste of a Stamp

Dr. Dobson sent me his 8-page newsletter imploring me to vote for McCain/Palin. I've been wondering all along how Dobson would spin Palin.

In my upbringing, the kingdom of sex and gender was ruled by King James Dobson and Queen Elisabeth Eliot. In that worldview, a woman like Palin is a "Bad Mother." Mothers are responsible for their children's choices, so a teen-age pregnancy is only partly the teenager's fault -- it is mostly her mother's fault. After all, Palin was working, not devoting her days to monitoring her teenager's behavior, so there you go -- teen-age pregnancy is the result of women in the workplace. And mothers of preschool children, disabled or not, should not work. Mothers can work part-time during school hours after their kids are in school. Their work can supplement the man's income, but should not disrupt their children's lives, their domestic work, or their husband's breadwinning supremacy. In this view, Palin has emasculated her husband, failed her children, distorted her femininity, and disobeyed her God.

So when Dobson writes, Sarah Palin is "a portrait of Christian motherhood and womanhood," my head is sent spinning. Did I misunderstand the last 30 years of family-focused propaganda that sailed into my home via direct mailings, magazines, and Christian bookstore books? I know I didn't.

Dobson assuages readers who are concerned about a mother of a special needs preschooler running for VP. He says, "I have never suggested that it is wrong for mothers to work outside the home...I have said, however, that if a mother is going to enter the workplace, she and her husband must first find a way to meet the needs of their children." The Palins are doing this, of course, so "the Palins need our prayers, not our disdain, at this critical moment in our nation's history."

Again, my head spins. First of all, it's pathetic how Christians including Dobson will twist even their Christian message for the sake of accumulating political power. But second of all, take a second look at what he says about Palin's mothering. I like it. If Christians in general, and Dobson specifically, had treated my grandmother, my mother, or me with the grace here extended to Palin, my own sense of femininity could have been blessed with grace instead of judgment I've learned to internalize and wield against myself. It's hurtful that Dobson would generate this much grace for her, for the sake of politics, when grace couldn't be found for so many other working moms, moms of pregnant teens, and men and women in egalitarian marriages, for the sake of religious purity.

But what the hell, let's take Dobson's advice to heart. Let's encourage conservative evangelical husbands and wives to work together to provide for their families. Let's encourage women to work and serve in society at the same time as they meets their children's needs. Let's pray for families instead of judging them.

But I'll focus on the family in my own way at the polls.

9 Comments:

  • This post has been removed by the author.

    By Blogger Jenell Williams Paris, at 7:29 PM  

  • Exactly. :)

    By Anonymous Sharon, at 9:45 AM  

  • I, too, marveled (and not in a good way) at Dobson's contortionist rendering of McCain/Palin as the Christian choice. Where's the praise for Obama's family choices, his devotion to his grandmother in the waning days of the campaign? It's just lost in a cloud of partisan fog. Judges, gay marriage and abortion rhetoric. That all there is.

    By Blogger Brian Howell, at 4:43 PM  

  • Dobson plays partisan politics, yes, and you get the feeling he would have found a way to justify or work around anything on the Republican ticket that his listeners/readers find questionable. But in fairness to him, he's never been dogmatic about a mother staying home, has he? Certainly not as dogmatic as other conservative family gurus (or as Elisabeth Elliot).

    In fact, I've always found his family advice and political advice to be strangely out of tune with each other. Whereas Dobson can be, within a certain field of options, accepting of various approaches to parenting (spanking or not, woman working or not, etc.), he's not accepting of various approaches to politics. I've always looked at this as an indication of his lack of expertise in politics. In his area of training, he can see nuance and gray areas; in his area of passion (but no training), not so much.

    Anyway, this is sort of beside the point you're making about Dobson's obvious political maneuvering. It just honestly surprised me that you see him as representative of the strictest kind of evangelical family rule-making. Perhaps I haven't been paying enough attention to him lately.

    By Blogger Madison, at 5:47 PM  

  • This is a seriously awesome post.

    By Blogger K2, at 10:47 PM  

  • Lets.

    By Blogger sleeping with bread, at 12:58 AM  

  • Outstanding post. Thank you for your thoughts.

    By Blogger Jeff, at 12:37 PM  

  • It bugs me to no end when church leaders enter the political fray. I can think of nothing righteous about it.

    By Blogger IP, at 9:32 PM  

  • Occasional blog-stalker finally coming out in the open...

    Did you read the interesting article in the New Yorker:

    "RED SEX, BLUE SEX: Why do so many evangelical teen-agers become pregnant?" by Margaret Talbot

    http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/03/081103fa_fact_talbot

    As an evangelical Christian, it was very interesting to read how evangelicals are seen...

    Taryn

    By Blogger Trynsimple, at 3:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?